Skip to main content Skip to navigation

PH9G2-30 Classics of Analytic Philosophy

Department
Philosophy
Level
Taught Postgraduate Level
Credit value
30
Assessment
100% coursework
Study location
University of Warwick main campus, Coventry

Introductory description

PH9G2 Classics of Analytic Philosophy

Module aims

Understanding contemporary analytic philosophy requires understanding its historical context and development, as well as some of its main methodological innovations. This module aims to introduce aspects of the history of analytic philosophy, core philosophy of language-related themes, and central approaches to engaging with those and other themes, through close scrutiny of some classic texts. Amongst the aims of this module is encouraging critical reflection on the varieties of analytic approaches to philosophical questions, as well as comparisons amongst them, and some of the historical roots of those approaches. Another aim is to introduce students to some of the central ideas of key analytic thinkers including Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein, with special focus on issues surrounding language and its use. A third aim is to foster critical engagement with those ideas, and their supporting arguments, through close scrutiny of texts. A fourth aim is to introduce students to some main tools developed in these texts which are now basic elements in the contemporary analytic philosopher’s toolkit.

Outline syllabus

This is an indicative module outline only to give an indication of the sort of topics that may be covered. Actual sessions held may differ.

  1. Analytic Philosophy – historical overview
  2. Frege -- “On Sense and Reference”
  3. Russell -- “On Denoting”
  4. Moore -- “Proof of an External World”
  5. Carnap – “Elimination of Metaphysics through the logical analysis of language”
  6. Wittgenstein – Excerpts from Philosophical Investigations - Private language argument/philosophy as therapy.
  7. Anscombe – “The First Person”
  8. Quine -- “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”
  9. Putnam -- “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students should be able to:

  • Subject knowledge and understanding: students should have an advanced understanding of debates about specific analytic philosophers and some of their core ideas, as well as an appreciation of aspects of the historical development of analytic philosophy.
  • Key skills: students should be able to come to an independent interpretation and evaluation of the relevant literature, explain complex positions and arguments in their own words, and communicate those ideas and arguments clearly both orally and in writing
  • Cognitive skills: students should be able to identify the important claims within readings, understand the structure of arguments, test views for strengths and weaknesses, make pertinent use of examples, and compare the substance of views consistently.
  • Subject‐specific skills: students should be able to express themselves using precise philosophical vocabulary, appreciate varieties of analytic approaches and their interconnections, and engage independently in philosophical debate.

Indicative reading list

Reading lists can be found in Talis

Subject specific skills

(i) The ability to understand philosophical issues and arguments that figure in the background to contemporary work. (ii) The ability to critically engage with philosophical ideas and arguments.
(iii) The ability to articulate philosophical issues and arguments.
(iv) The ability to read philosophical texts, including an ability to understand and explain technical philosophical vocabulary from these historical texts, an awareness of debates about the historical context of these texts, and of debates about interpretation of certain key terms

Transferable skills

(i) The ability to communicate information (verbally and in written form) to people both expert and non-expert in the field.
(ii) The ability to analyse, evaluate, critique and apply complex information gathered from reading, reflection, reasoning or communication.
(iii) The ability to effectively manage schedules and deadlines.

Study time

Type Required
Lectures 9 sessions of 2 hours (69%)
Seminars 8 sessions of 1 hour (31%)
Total 26 hours

Private study description

No private study requirements defined for this module.

Costs

No further costs have been identified for this module.

You must pass all assessment components to pass the module.

Students can register for this module without taking any assessment.

Assessment group A1
Weighting Study time Eligible for self-certification
Assessment component
7500 word essay 100% Yes (extension)
Reassessment component is the same
Feedback on assessment

Feedback on essays will be provided on the coversheet for the essay, addressing standard areas
of evaluation and individual content.

There is currently no information about the courses for which this module is core or optional.